Reasons > Borrowing > Choices
Reasons >
 Choices Absorbing Faith The Bible is true
  First Independently From Judaism Xerox copying  
Choices

.

.The stories were made up, sure. But they weren't made up randomly, they were made up to fit the standard ancient shtick about Gods and souls
Greg

  

The ancient evidence under the Facts bar has proven lots of Pagan-Christian similarities. In this Reasons part of POCM we'll go through the possible explanations of those similarities, looking at which explanations are comprehensive and consistent. And which aren't.

This Choices page is here to introduce you to:
1 The list of standard explanations of the Pagan - Christian similarities
2 The two utterly different understandings of cause-and-effect hidden in the different explanations.

The List
 Paganism had its God and soul ideas first. Christians had the same ideas second. So, where did Christianity get all those Pagan-looking rituals and theologies? Fortunately you don't have to trust me to come up with possible explanations. Believers have been beavering on the problem for several generations. They've come up with a standard list.

Here it is. Each entry has its own page here under the Borrowing tab.
 
Cause = meaning;
Effect = "facts"

Cause = "Facts"
Effect = God's meaning
   1
 Christianity borrowed its ideas by absorbing the ideas and prejudices of ancient culture.  
 
2
I have faith that Christianity is new and unique, sent from God.
 
3
The bible is true. The New Testament gospels are accurate, first hand histories written by people who knew Jesus and recorded His teachings. Christian rituals and theologies are found in those teachings.
 
4
Christian ideas are different from Pagan its ideas; Christianity did not borrow its ideas
 
5
Christianity had its ideas first; Christianity did not borrow its ideas.
 
6
Christianity developed its ideas independently, all on its own, with no Pagan influence; Christianity did not borrow its ideas
 
7
Christianity got its ideas from Judaism; Christianity did not borrow its ideas from Paganism.
 
    8
 Christianity borrowed its ideas by consciously and deliberately xerox-copying Pagan myths and rituals.
Cause and effect
Believers and Pagan-origins-ers see the cause and effect of Christianity's rites and theologies very differently. Let's start with believers.

Believers imagine the events in the New Testament gospels are basically true. Jesus was real. The meaning of the story of Jesus comes from the facts of His life. The facts came first. The meaning came second. Jesus was God. Because He was God, He could do miracles.
 
Jesus as the Sun God  

Pagan-origins-ers see it the other way. They understand that ancient culture had standard ideas about Gods and their powers, and about the eternal destiny of the human soul. They understand that the stories about how Dionysus, and Kore, and Osiris brought salvation did not reflect real facts. The stories were made up, sure. But they weren't made up randomly, they were made up to fit the standard ancient shtick about Gods and souls. The stories were similar because the ideas were similar. The ideas came first; the "facts" came later.

For Pagan- origins-ers, "Christianity borrowed miracles from Paganism," doesn't mean "facts" about Jesus' were copied, miracle by miracle, from Pagan myths. It means early Christians knew and believed the standard ancient Pagan shtick about God and the eternal desitny of the human soul, and they made up their Jesus myths to fit. The meaning came first, the "facts" came second. Gods did miracles. Jesus was a God. Naturally, Jesus did miracles.

Greg's rambling. Skip this if you want
Notice in the explanations table that all the apologists' explanations of the Pagan-Christian similarities are constructed to preserve the believer's facts-first version of cause and effect.

And the Pagan-origins-ers' explanation number 1 must include the conclusion that the "facts" about Jesus were made up, made up to fit the pre-determined meaning of the myth.

Interestingly explanation number eight, which as we've seen is not supported by the ancient evidence, is the non-apologists' explanation most often attacked and "refuted" by apologists. I think this is because number eight preserves facts-first cause and effect, so it is the non-Christian explanation whose basic mechanism apologists assume to be natural.

  
Choices